Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting... Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting sustainability and finding solutions to the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. In his free time, Nicholas enjoys the great outdoors and can often be found exploring some of the most beautiful and remote locations around the world. Read more about Nicholas Vincent Read More
Want to reach our audience?
According to CNN, dozens of veteran climate scientists are joining forces to challenge a new Trump administration report that downplays the severity of the climate crisis. The Department of Energy (DOE) document, authored by five long-time climate skeptics, is being used to justify weakening Pollution rules and rolling back federal climate protections. Critics say the report misuses research, omits critical context, and was produced without peer review.
Andy Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University, is leading the coordinated response. He and other scientists aim to submit detailed public comments dismantling the DOE’s claims, ensuring accurate science remains part of the official record. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has removed congressionally mandated National Climate Assessments from federal websites, prompting fears that credible climate data is being erased or altered before republication.
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has announced its own fast-tracked review of climate science since 2009 — the year the landmark “endangerment finding” linked human-caused climate change to public health risks. NAS president Marcia McNutt said the review will deliver an up-to-date, science-backed assessment for policymakers.
Scientists like Kim Cobb of Brown University warn that replacing gold-standard climate assessments with misleading reports marks a dangerous step backward. Others, like Zeke Hausfather, stress that while worst-case warming scenarios may be less likely thanks to global emission cuts and clean energy adoption, even a 3°C rise would cause devastating impacts.
The consensus among climate experts is clear: this is not just a policy debate, but an urgent fight to defend factual science against politically motivated distortion. If we want a livable future for humans and animals alike, we must stand behind peer-reviewed research, reject fossil fuel propaganda, and push for systemic change — including plant-based diets, renewable energy expansion, and strong climate laws.
Sign These Petitions!
Please sign our latest and most urgent petitions to help the planet. Every signature counts!
Easy Ways to Help the Planet:
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Keep One Green Planet independent — chip in what you can, or become a member and get ad-free browsing, a voice in our community, and the good feeling of fueling a sustainable, healthier, and kinder world.
Comments: